Turning to a new page.

1. In the JonBenet case, the DNA was so small and could have came from the manufacturer of her underwear instead of an intruder..

2. Touch DNA aint gonna convince me JonBenet wasn't murdered by John or Patsy. I know damn well it was an inside job..

3. I think people can use DNA and hype it up like in the JonBenet Ramsey case..

.


Sometimes it gets tiresome. These particular gems of wisdom happen to come from Levi Page, some sort of youthful internet Media Darling who is often on TV news shows.

I mean consider that underwear theory of his. Someone sneezes in a Vietnamese factory and the dna winds up in the panties but only in the locations that later had blood spots but not in any of the test swatches, yet that dna also somehow migrates to other garments, but only in the locations where an attacker would have placed his hands to undress her.

Consider his evaluation of the quality of evidence: DNA is the most reliable forensic tool we have but that is of no concern to him. He somehow knows that it was an inside job which of course is some sort of code phrase. A shorthand way of saying that the parents decided to kill their daughter, cause the husband to lose his job and the wife to lose her health insurance, spend all their money on lawyers and become the most hated couple in America. He somehow knows this and considers this knowledge that somehow came to him to be sufficient for us to ignore the highly reliable scientific results that are available as evidence.

Hype it up? You should know, pal!! Pure, utter hype.

I think I will turn the page!